|
For most regions of the world,
increasing water productivity in agriculture, both
irrigated and rainfed systems, rather than allocating
more water, holds the greatest potential to improve
food security and reduce poverty at the lowest environmental
cost.This will require a combination of agronomic,
socio-economic and institutional interventions. Low-productivity
rainfed agriculture requires 4000 tonnes of green
water to produce a tonne of cereal grains, often course
grains. Irrigation systems in Africa and Asia typically
require 2000 tonnes of water to produce a tonne of
cereal grains such as rice or wheat. In the best irrigation
systems it takes only 500 tonnes. That is the promise
- and the challenge for the sector.
|
| ACTIONS
:
|
| Improving
irrigation management
Irrigation system management can be improved
to provide more reliable water supply to farmers
through storage and improved operation of reservoirs,
better distribution of water with improved control
structures as well as more responsive management.More
reliable water supply allows farmers to invest
in better on-farm water management such as better
land leveling, zero tillage, or pressure irrigation.
Improved management usually requires improved
institutions as well as improved technologies.Governments
rarely manage to operate and maintain irrigation
systems successfully on their own. Farmer participation
increases success rates. Schemes have to be
financially self-sufficient on operation and
maintenance and farmers can, and do, pay for
well-performing systems.
|
| Multiple
use systems: single systems for domestic use,
agriculture, aquaculture, agroforestry and livestock.
|
|
Rural people often do not distinguish between
water for domestic or livelihood purposes. However,water
projects and water experts usually still focus
on a single purpose. Increased value can be
captured by designing, planning and managing
projects that enable multiple uses in an
integrated manner.
|

Diagram showing a multiple use system for water.
Source: MUS project |
| Enhancing
the safe and productive use of wastewater in
irrigated agriculture
|
Growing water demands of rapidly expanding urban
areas also create the opportunity to re-use
the equally growing wastewater flows. Making
an asset out of wastewater for peri-urban small-scale
farmers may make sanitation affordable for poor
urban dwellers.Development of appropriate treatment
systems to make the waste water biologically
safe,while keeping the nutrients that replace
fertilizer for farmers, is the challenge. Potential
benefits include improved health in urban slums,
livelihoods for peri-urban farmers, improved
nutrition (vegetables) for the urban poor, and
reduced pollution.
|
Wastewater is being
increasingly used in
agriculture and can be a valuable asset
for productive use if it can be properly
treated
Photograph by Sanjini de Silva IWMI
|
| Adapting
farming practices to increased water scarcity
When water is relatively abundant,
and its cost to farmers is negligible, farmers
are not motivated to conserve water. As water
moves out of agriculture to cities, and population
densities increase in rural areas, the scarcity
and value of water increases. Farmers can, and
will, respond to increased scarcity, or higher
cost such as pumping cost at greater depth at
realistic energy prices, by using water more
effectively.
|
| |
|
FACTS AND FIGURES
|
| Irrigation
efficiency is often confusing due to different
definitions used at different scales. In addition,
increasing irrigation efficiency is not necessarily
good for anything. Water productivity links
the water consumed with the outputs produced.
Just as “crop yield” is the productivity
of land, often measured as ton per hectare,
water productivity of the same crop is measured
as the “crop per drop”, for instance
as kilograms of rice or wheat per cubic meter
of water used.When a farmer produces rice, vegetables,
as well as fish from his farmpond, then the
combined water productivity has to be expressed
in monetary units.Water use efficiency is often
defined in a similar manner as water productivity
and is thus the same thing.
|
| |
DEBATES
|
 |
Good
governance and IWRM are also important
factors in water productivity. While technical
solutions are needed to increase blue
water productivity it is widely recognized
that good governance, integrated water
resources management (IWRM), and strong
supporting policies are also important
requirements to improve the productivity
of systems |
| |
|
 |
Increasing
water productivity is necessary but not
sufficient. In practice, local gains in
water productivity can provide an excellent
incentive to farmers to intensify or expand
cultivated areas. Along with water productivity
enhancement on-farm, however, must come
rules for allocating scarce resources
to make sure that water released from
agriculture is used to meet other purposes
such as ecological restoration. |
|
Water
Productivity (WP) Definitions: |
WP-field:
The amount of crop output in physical terms
(crop yield in kilogram) or monetary terms (crop
yield times its price in financial or economic
terms) divided by the amount of water consumed
(evaporated from the soil or transpired by the
plant, the evapotranspiration) - in other words,
the crop per drop.
WP-basin: At the basin level,
water productivity needs to be understood in
the widest possible sense, including crop, livestock
and fishery yields, ecosystem services as well
as social impacts such as on health, together
with the systems of resource governance that
assure an equitable distribution of these benefits.
Increasing water productivity is therefore
equivalent to obtaining more value from each
drop of water.
Improving water productivity by 40% on rainfed
and irrigated lands could reduce the need for
additional withdrawals for irrigation over the
next 25 years to zero.
Typical water productivity figures for
staple cereal crops (rice and wheat):
Typical low performing irrigation system - 0.5
kg per cubic meter
State-of-the-art irrigation system in Asia -
2.0 kg per cubic meter
Rainfed systems in Sub-Saharan Africa - 0.2
kg per cubic meter
Rainfed systems in Europe/North-America - 2.0kg
per cubic meter |
|
|